If you think that sounds like a tabloid headline, wait ’til you read the actual conversation “transcript.” I published it over at my Golf For Women blog. If you enjoy ridiculous (yet somehow plausible) Tiger Woods theories, you might want to check it out.
The Golfchick
That chick blabbing about anything golf related.
Tag: robbie biershenk (page 2 of 32)
I don’t remember exactly when it all started going downhill for my golf game and I don’t remember where. All I know is, since October – I am ashamed to admit – I have only been playing golf about once a month at our club events. So naturally, my game keeps getting worse. I feel confusion as I stand over the golf ball and am unable to get comfortable. I used to be relatively confident that I would put the ball somewhere close to my target, even if it was a few yards off or ended up in a hazard. It didn’t really cross my mind that I might not hit a solid shot. That is no longer the case.
Lately it’s gotten so bad that I’ve lost all confidence. I never know what’s going to happen when I swing that golf club. Chunk, dribble, crazy duck hook… it’s so frustrating! I had more confidence when I was brand new to the game (and scored better on occasion).
So I’m looking for my lost swing. It’s not easy, because if golfers find a better golf swing out there, they’re not likely to turn it in at the pro shop after their round. I have to hope that it was found by a good golfer who would find my swing shabby in comparison and that he or she had the sense to turn it in so their original swing could take its rightful place.
On a promising note
I played golf twice this weekend and though the pro shops at Soule Park (Ojai, CA) and Glen Annie (Goleta, CA) didn’t have my swing in their lost and founds, I did find pieces of it out on the golf courses. I started striking the ball a little better and more importantly, my brain let go of its worrying and distracting swing thoughts on many occasions. The result was cleaner shots and returning to my usual club selections instead of “clubbing up” to compensate for my trepidation. My chipping (formerly my strength) and putting (with which I’m known to struggle on and off) were atrocious, so my scores were still remarkably high, but I didn’t care because I felt better about my swing. That’s my key focus right now, and I don’t think getting my short game back will be as difficult. At least not as worrisome.
Instruction
Yes, I know I said I was going to seek professional help. I haven’t yet, but it’s still in my plans. In addition to a time crunch, there has also been a vicious circle going with my frequency of play: I need to play more to improve, but I’m not motivated to make the time because I got so frustrated out there. Now that I have a semblance of hope (if not quite confidence), and the spring weather is making me twitchy to get out there anyway, I hope to start turning things around. And there are a few more golf courses to check where I might have left my swing.
The ladies played a pretty golf course this weekend and Paula Creamer was once again victorious in Hawaii. But shouldn’t a golf course be more than just a pretty face?
In my latest post on Swing Thoughts over at GFW, I discuss Ko’Olina Golf Course and why it shouldn’t be on the LPGA rotation. I’m no expert, but even though they call it a “championship course,” perhaps Ted Robinson designed it solely with tourists in mind.
The forward tees there have a course and slope rating of 71.8/126. That first number is the score a scratch player should make when playing from those tees. So I’m supposed to believe if the LPGA players moved up and actually played from there, they would average less than one birdie per round? Hogwash.
A pro would need to have an unusually bad round to shoot over par there. And if she happens to be native to the area and doesn’t break par, that’s the type of disaster that only happens once in a professional career. Oh, unless her career is more about marketing than golf. Then it, like, probably wouldn’t, um, bother her.
Let’s face it: there are barriers that prevent women from taking up golf as well as staying in once they’ve taken the plunge. Not the least of which is the attitude that still exists among some men.
With the recent Kelly Tilghman/GolfWeek situation, the golf world at least seems to me making strides towards quelling its racist history and reputation. Not so for sexism, which is still reinforced and even encouraged. The attitudes in professional golf set an example and trickle down to the amateur level. Allowing or ignoring it at the top just isn’t going to help. When women speak up about the comments or treatment we receive, we’re mostly ridiculed for having a chip on our shoulders or being “whiners,” and if we keep quiet, we just perpetuate the problem. When you can’t even win for losing, it’s understandable that women might want to turn away from the game altogether. But we musn’t!
Ladies, just play. Don’t let them get to you. Speak up if that’s your style. Let it all roll off your back if you don’t like to rock the boat, but play!
Golf is such a mental game. The slightest distraction can hinder performance and when you encounter misogynist pigs on the links, it’s difficult not to let it seep into your brain and mess with your swing (and score), leading to another barrier: frustration. Some women leave the game because the ratio of hassle to improvement doesn’t seem worth the time and effort. The good news is that golf manufacturers, retailers, pro shops and teaching professionals are recognizing the buying power of our demographic and are catering more and more to our needs. The avenues are there for you, you just have to persevere and not worry about the lack of fairness that such a barrier exists.
Personally, I enjoy golf so much that no “unfair barrier” could ever make me leave it. If you break through the barriers you experience, chances are you will feel the same. Which brings me to another one: confidence (or lack thereof). Many women feel intimidated at the thought of getting out on the course. There can be many reasons for this, and they’re all kind of inter-related, such as lack of athletic background, anxiety about rules and etiquette, fear of embarassment or ridicule, performance anxiety, and beginner jitters. None of those were ever a problem for me. I have an athletic background, I’m an avid learner so my knowledge of rules and etiquette surpassed most casual players rather quickly, I don’t have much shame, I thrive on the challenge of performing, and I love the feeling of butterflies in my stomach. But if that doesn’t describe you (most are mental and you could become that way if you wanted, but that’s another story for another blog), there are still ways to surmount these issues and get up to speed. Now that I’m thinking of it, I should do another post on just that topic. This one’s getting long as it is. The point is, lack of confidence is only a hurdle, not a wall.
Just this week, I had a conversation with a colleague that went something like this:
She: You’ve only been playing for three years? Did you play before and you only just picked it back up?
Me: No, I first picked up a club about three years ago.
She: So I can do it! It’s not too late!
(she’s younger than I am)
Me: Of course you can!
She: Well I love going to the range and hitting balls. It’s so much fun. But I really want to play.
Me: You should! Why haven’t you?
She: I’ve been told I’m not worth the tee time. (laughs)
Me: (good that she sees the light side of that) Ohh.. that’s just wrong. Get out there. A lot of the clowns out there aren’t worthy and it doesn’t stop them.
She: I’m going to. I’m really gonna do it.
Hooray! Another volunteer to our troops! Then the discussion turned to gear selection and such, which is something many beginners (women and men) struggle with. She, like me, is going to go out and immediately acquire the best money can buy that feels good for her swing. And get a proper fitting while she’s at it. Of course, this isn’t for everyone and most people would recommend some kind of starter set while you develop your swing before you invest your hard earned clams on the latest and greatest.
Now, this is a highly intelligent, confident and successful woman who has been at least somewhat discouraged from entering the game for some amount of time. And if I remember correctly, the statement about her not being “worth the tee time” was from someone in her own family! But she’s been having fun on the range and, never having stepped foot on a golf course, already has the bug.
Sometimes all it takes is a toe in the shallow end to make you want to dive in. It’s an easy bug to catch and the stronger it gets, the further you get from the hurdles in the dust behind you.
Okay, I guess I should say turning to a pro. A teaching pro, that is.
After my lesson fiasco when I first started, I decided I wanted to continue to “do it myself” and learn by watching, reading, and practicing. Well, the practicing is nearly non-existent now and I don’t even have much time to play as practice. Sadly, my game has been showing it. In fact, it’s like I’ve completely lost my swing and have no confidence out there, so there’s extra motivation to seek outside help. In most areas of my life, I’m a do-it-yourselfer and take pride in that.  Golf is especially tricky so it would be extra rewarding to figure it out all on my own. But I wasn’t exactly a spring chicken when I took up this game, so I don’t really have the luxury of the years it would take to do that and sustain that avenue for pride.
Plus, I’d rather get better and enjoy my game more sooner rather than later. Yes, I enjoy just getting out there, but I enjoy it more the better I perform. And I am competitive and like to win and that hasn’t been possible lately. Finally, I have convinced myself that there’s no shame in getting instruction.
I have already chosen my teaching professional (though he doesn’t know it yet). Now I just need to find (take) the time to do it and get the ball rolling, so to speak.
I will literally keep you posted on what develops.
We didn’t plan our outfits (Phil’s never on the phone) but we both turned up to Sunday’s round wearing all black. And that has nothing to do with anything.
I confess – I like Phil Mickelson. Come on, it’s not like I’m alone here! Lefty’s got special something about him (not to mention a knockout smile, posed or candid) that I find quite pleasant. Knowing that I would be going to the Northern Trust Open for the final round on Sunday, I was so glad to watch him take the lead and thrilled to be there to watch him win.
But I wasn’t just there, I was there with a shiny new media credential, courtesy of my association with the respectable publication Golf For Women. (Thanks, Alena!) I had access to pretty much anywhere I wanted to go. I was inside the ropes taking photos, at the range, in the clubhouse… I could even have gone in the locker room but I was surprisingly and uncharacteristically timid, practically demure, at the event. I want to be allowed back, you know.
Phil even won despite my unlucky presence. I didn’t follow him all day, but I was up close and personal on the second hole where he found the bunker and again on the 9th where he found the 10th. (Sorry, Phil. Glad you worked it out in spite of me.)
At the trophy presentation, Phil gave a special shout out to Amy Alcott. He thanked her for her help at Riviera. I was intrigued and wanted to know more. Back in the media conference, I was prepared with my question: “Would you tell us more about your relationship with Amy Alcott and how she helped you this week?” Again, I was feeling strangely shy but I would have asked the question if someone didn’t relieve the pressure and ask the same thing once they were finished asking him about the golf course, his competitors and how this prepares him for match play (since he and Quinney basically went head-to-head down the stretch, it transitions nicely into this week’s tournament).
I can’t quote him exactly because I don’t have the transcripts, but he said she really helped him read the greens and talked about her extensive course knowledge. She knows how the greens slope. To paraphrase: “Everyone wants to walk with Amy in the pro-am.” But Phil got her that day and he picked her brain. In the same response, he also talked about how he has changed to a softer golf ball, which gives him a little more distance but that’s not why he uses it. He uses it for the feel and control. I surmised Amy had something to do with his choice, but I could be wrong. He also said he put a firmer insert in his putter so he could hear the golf ball coming off it, which makes him better with speed, touch and feel. He especially likes the softer ball with his short irons and wedges. All short game stuff – Amy (and Phil)’s specialty. And all in the response from that one question.
Who says women have no short game?
Anyway, I have a lot of terrific photos from the event and would love to put some up now, but I still haven’t had a chance to repair my site and it’s problem displaying images. I will get around to it soon and share some of those pictures with you.
Meanwhile, you can see a few of them on my GFW post about the event.
Also, congratulations to Annika on winning at Turtle Bay. Wasn’t that great to see? I’m so happy that both players I rooted for last weekend won!
Golf For Women launched a new project today to introduce their new “network” of bloggers. Among them is yours truly.
GFW is a golf magazine with a savvy web editor who saw the benefit of recruiting three female golf bloggers to contribute to their site. Starting today, I have a new blog over there called “Swing Thoughts.”
My first post is about the season opener on the LPGA Tour at the SBS Open at Turtle Bay. I love that golf course! Greg and I played there a couple times and it is one of those golf courses that is beautiful enough to distract you from your game, which adds to its already challenging layout. I wrote more about the Palmer Course at Turtle Bay in an article for Fairways + Greens Magazine that will hit the stands on March 1.
You know, when I first started this blog I thought the name Golf Chick lacked creativity and intended it to be a place holder until I came up with something better. But it stuck and now I can’t imagine it being anything else. Then came Golf Girl and Golf Gal and now we’re all blogging on Golf For Women. Maybe there’s something to this naming convention. Where’s Golf Lady, Golf Woman, Golf Betty, Golf Shiela, Golf Chippie (hey, I like that one), and Golf Goddess? Surely (Golf Shirley?) they’re coming.
I’m not sure how often Gayle (Golf Gal) and Patricia (Golf Girl) will be posting there, but they’re both busy bloggers so I’m sure you can count of lots of good content!
I’ll be posting over there weekly – at least that’s my intention – so check it out. I’ll put up a quick post here whenever I publish over there in case you forget. 
Happy 2008 LPGA Season!
(BTW, I still haven’t fixed the software snag so the images might not come through right now.)
I’m trying to upgrade the software for this blog but I’m experiencing technical difficulties. If you can even see this, please pardon the interruption while I try to sort it all out.
Thanks for reading and for your patience!
-Kristen
Yes, it’s another post about Tiger Woods. I’m just so in awe.
I have always enjoyed rooting for underdogs when I don’t have a favorite player or team to support in any given contest. However, I also appreciate excellence. I love seeing Tiger dominate so thoroughly just as I want to see The Patriots win the Super Bowl and have the perfect season. I’d be happy to watch Tiger win every tournament he plays this year (and he sure looks like he could pull that off).
It just seems impossible for anyone to be so consistently good at a game with so many intricacies that he outplays his peers every time. It’s to the point that he doesn’t really have peers. He’s in a flight all his own. For anyone who has ever played this crazy game, Tiger’s performance is beyond impressive to the point that it’s almost unbelievable.
I contend that the difference between him and every other golfer in the world is purely mental. Any one of those guys on Tour can train with coaches, work hard and perfect their swings so they can execute most of the time. The difference is maintaining the mental state to execute it more frequently. And keep maintaining it on the putting green. Hole after hole, round after round, tournament after tournament. Only Tiger has shown he can do that.
Is it in our genes?
I have the ability to focus at times, but I know my nature and how easily distracted I can be. There’s only so much “zone” my brain will allow. So, is the ability to have that kind of mental game in our DNA? I think so. Oh, we can work on it and train our minds and improve, but I think our potential in this capacity is hardwired. The thing is, we don’t know what we’re capable of so we can just keep pushing and trying. And when we hit a wall, we can go get new equipment because there must be something else going on. (If we “upgrade” from the latest driver to the greatest driver and it helps, it’s probably a placebo effect anyway.) Oh, don’t you love this game?
Demonstrating how the USGA can play all the games it wants and it won’t bother him, Tiger recently commented on the meaninglessness of par (I agree). Talking about how the USGA makes changes to par for certain holes and tournaments, he said:
“The USGA just thrives on that … Par is just a number. What I mean by that is that Pebble could set up for a 72, and I would have been what, 16-under par? So under par doesn’t really matter that much. It’s just going out there and shooting a number.”
It’s just going out there and shooting a number, people! Sure, mine’s (way) above par and his is below. Eh… Par, shmar.
Anyway, I have to wonder what goes on in Tiger’s mind during a round. Not par. Not comments from wishful rivals. Is it the number? Certain swing thoughts? Is it like a chamber of silence?
Is it possible to be hyperbolic when discussing Tiger?
Is Tiger approaching a singularity to transcend even his own biological limitations? Someday, will there be a chip we can install in our brains that will allow us to do the same? Am I totally geeking out right now? Will I ever be able to write anything besides a question again? Is it time for a martini?
© 2024 The Golfchick
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑
Lorena relegates Annika to Phil Mickelson status
Annika Sorenstam had a great start to the season with her 70th win at Turtle Bay. She hung in there to take 4th place at the Fields Open, 4 shots behind winner Paula Creamer.
Then Lorena Ochoa began her 2008 season with an authoritative “Not so fast, Annika” performance in stormy Singapore at the HSBC Women’s Champions. Oh, Annika secured a solo second place, but at 11 strokes behind Lorena’s -20, it seemed more like second fiddle. It’s just one tournament and I would love to see some closer races and some more Annika wins, but for now it sure seems like Annika : Lorena :: Phil : Tiger.
However, Annika set the standard for excellence in women’s golf. And while Lorena might notch some wins in individual tournaments near the end of Annika’s career, she’s going to need an awfully long ball retriever to vault the pole set so high by Sorenstam herself. For all we know, she may not have plans for a lengthy enough career to get there. Either way, this should be a year of great golf on the LPGA Tour.
Which brings me to my Gripe of the Post (I seem to be having a GOP quite frequently these days, no?):
After a full week and not catching any of the early telecasts, I was so looking forward to settling down to bloop through at least a couple hours of coverage for the final round on my DVR. I had been tracking the scores so I already knew it was a blowout, so I summarily deleted the early rounds from my playlist and eagerly started up Sunday’s final. What a mess. First, there was only an hour of coverage. An HOUR! Woohoo… we got to see the leaders play a few holes and we saw the groups ahead of them play a few shots while the leaders waited to play. With slow play and rain delays, it was an 8+ hour round of golf! That’s all they could bring us? Then there was the cheesy music as they transitioned to and from advertisements. With all that waiting around time, couldn’t The Golf Channel have assembled a better program to intersperse with the “live” play? Nope.
Plus, I don’t know how much to blame on the weather, but I’ve seen much better pictures from other poor-weather events. We were treated to a gray, misty, blurry picture with terrible sound, dull color, and lackluster commentary. Is that any way to encourage viewership? It certainly didn’t do justice to the field of vibrant, colorful, youthful players, who were effectively washed out.
The ladies are giving us great golf and I want better coverage of it. And I would think the LPGA would want better, not to mention the sponsors.
Golly, the GOP became longer than the actual topic. I shall look inward.
Next post.