The Golfchick

That chick blabbing about anything golf related.

Category: Pro Golf And Golfer Commentary (page 5 of 7)

A year later, Tiger wins one for the girl

When Tiger won last year’s PGA Championship, he and his wife Elin announced that they were expecting a child.

Tiger and Elin at Medinah

Last year at Medinah

That child, Sam Alexis Woods, was present and rooting in a baby golf chick kind of way as her father won the same event this year for her coming out party. Her first tournament, his 59th PGA Tour win, his 13th major win, his first major with her as his good luck charm. Oh who am I kidding? As if Tiger needs luck.

Sam Alexis appears to be human, but then so does Tiger when he’s not playing golf. Can that kind of dominance and perfect timing really be the work of humans?

Tiger, Elin and Sam Alexis Woods

On another note, was I the only one who enjoyed the “sweaty man” aspect of watching this tournament? Well, a handful or two of those men, anyway.

Next post.

You call that television coverage?

Not just a tournament, a major. Not just a major, the British Open. Not just the British Open, the first time St. Andrews has been home to a women’s professional event. Let’s see how these women play links golf. Lots of the women. On lots of the golf holes. Oops, nevermind.

TNT saw fit to cover the event for 1.5 hours on the first two days. ABC graced us with a whopping 2 hours on the final days. We got to see a handful of women play a handful of holes between 11 and 18. Whoopee.

Writers covered it better

At least we had good written coverage from the Golf For Women Editor’s blogs. However, of their nine contributors, most of the stories came from the only two men on that list, Dave Allen and John Huggan. Editor in Chief Susan Reed was there but I only saw one article from her. I found that odd.

Don’t get me wrong, the men filed some great stories and had interesting takes. For example, John Huggan points out that the Old Course is a public facility and women have been playing there for a long time. While it is significant that it is hosting its first women’s professional event, the real “breakthrough” is that women were allowed into the R&A clubhouse for the first time. Or was it a breakthrough? Here are some excerpts from John Huggan’s piece on the issue:

…to be sure, it is nice that the all-male membership of golf’s ruling body (outside Mexico and the United States) has for once relaxed its misogynistic and out-dated regulations regarding the presence of women inside one of the game’s most iconic buildings.

But let’s get real people. The headline on this story should read, “R&A behave like normal people shock.”

…the St. Rule club that makes its home on the right side of the 18th fairway, is, in fact, open only to women. Which makes it no better – or worse – than the R&A in my book.

Anyway, let’s keep this whole clubhouse thing in perspective. While it has a certain symbolic significance, in the broad scheme of things nothing has changed. Next week women will again be barred from entering.

Boo to television, Bravo (and one small brava) to the bloggers.

And a huge, heartfelt congratulations to Lorena Ochoa on her first major win at such a storied golf course.

Lorena Ochoa waves

Next post.

Congratulations, Natalie!

I knew she was more than a pin-up girl. I was certain she was not doomed to Anna Kournikova status. If you let Natalie’s charming smile and on-course strut fool you into thinking there wasn’t a fierce competitor under there, you probably didn’t bet on her like I recommended.

Natalie Gulbis victorious

Okay, it wasn’t a prediction to literally bet on her in the Evian Masters this year, just a general “Natalie’s not just a bikini model” type of statement. Buy her calendars, look for those sexy upskirt shots during play and wish to be her bicycle seat all you want, just don’t count her out of competitions. She has a competitive spirit and a winning attitude in addition to a relentless marketing team and now she has a trophy to prove it.

So congratulations, Natalie. You’re a champion.

I just wish I could have seen the playoff. When I got home late last night after avoiding seeing the results of the tournament, I watched the coverage on TiVo. But I’m an idiot and didn’t set it to record beyond the allocated time slot. Natalie was in the clubhouse preparing for a possible playoff with Juli Inkster or Jeong Jang, who both needed to birdie 18 to force the playoff and were both in the middle of the fairway. Ding! Delete now? Damnit! I had to look it up to find out Inkster three-putted for bogey and Jang chipped up for a tap-in birdie. The sudden death playoff started on 18, where Jang had birdied all four days and Gulbis had only birdied twice. But the playoff went no further. Jang made par and Gulbis sank the victorious birdie putt. I’m sorry I missed it, Natalie. I would have loved to watch you win.

Next post.

Seems like a different tournament without Wie

Or is it just me? The whole production, the vibe of the event… it all actually seems like a golf tournament instead of a circus with a sideshow.

Without Wie around, we actually got to see some footage of Jesper Parnevik at the John Deere. In fact, had he made that putt for his third birdie in a row, I was going to dub him Jesper Birdienevik. He missed it and birdied the next hole for 3 out of 4, but that didn’t cut my mustard. Three in a row, Jesper. That’s the deal.

Another fresh face is on the scene and we were treated to some coverage of this little cutie:

philip francis

Philip Francis, the 18 year old amateur out of Scottsdale, AZ. Will he really play for UCLA or will he get the pro bug and bug out?

The kid looked like he was just having a blast out there. He shot 3 over in the first round with what looked like his buddy on the bag. They were all smiles and chit chatting along the way. He nailed a great second shot on 17 to give himself an eagle opportunity and both boys just looked psyched. He missed it and tapped in for birdie and they headed off to 18 as if they were just going out to hook up with some girls at the movies. Very relaxed and carefree. Not that seeing Duffy Waldorf making a run with his fancy golf balls and watching Billy Mayfair actually sink putts with that crazy stroke wasn’t interesting, but the addition of this Francis kid really brightened things up. He’s T129 and probably has to shoot under par today to make the cut. I’ll be rooting for him.

I was going to switch over to the Jamie Farr Owens Corning Classic today and watch the women play, but here on the west coast, it’s on at the same time as the John Deere. I have old school Tivos so I can only record one thing at a time. So today, both Tivos will be rolling so I can root for the kid as I bloop-bloop my way through the coverage and still not miss the women’s event.

Next post.

The U.S. Senior Open that doesn’t exist

Stuart over at the Waggle Room alerted me to a terrible injustice in the golf world. I guess I already knew at some level but I’m not sure why it wasn’t more clear on my radar.

The U.S. Senior Open is now taking place at Whistling Straits, with Allen Doyle trying to become the second three-time winner and first to win the tournament three years in a row.

The Senior Open is one of 15 national championships run by the United States Golf Association (not counting the Walker Cup and Curtis Cup). Every one of those championships is played twice – once for the men (the U.S. Open, U.S. Amateur, U.S. Senior Amateur, for example) and once for the women (U.S. Women’s Open, U.S. Women’s Amateur, U.S. Women’s Senior Amateur).

Every one of those championships except one. Because while the 50-and-over guys get their Open championship this week, there is no U.S. Senior Women’s Open. And that’s really inexcusable. It’s well past time for the USGA to add a Women’s Senior Open.

Check out his full post in which he lists some players he knows would be playing if they held such an event based on his own communications with some of them.

I know I’d love to see such a tournament. Do they think people wouldn’t watch and that they couldn’t get sponsors and advertisers?

The one thing his post doesn’t have is a call to action. He ends the post by simply stating that the USGA needs to “get off its duff” and add the championship to its playlist. Maybe if we all emailed the USGA with our desire to watch those legendary golf chicks battle it out, they’d get the picture. And if you’re a potential sponsor, you know what to do.

Update: Stuart added a link for you use if you want to write that letter.

Another update: Sarah at The Daily Mulligan wrote a letter to the USGA you can copy and paste.

Next post.

Julieta Granada blogs

Julieta Granada, who won last year’s ADT championship and set an LPGA record for a $1 million first place check, is currently T2 (at -1) at the weather-delayed U.S. Open at Pine Needles. But did you know she is also a blogger?

Julieta Granada bio

Already this season, she’s had two top 10 finishes and earned over $250K. You’d think she’d be too busy or have better things to do than blog. But no. This sweet young player from Paraguay has agreed to blog about her preparation and time leading up to the HSBC Women’s World Match Play Championship (July 19-22 at Wykagyl Country Club in New Rochelle, NY).

Originally, HSBC thought it would be too much to ask of a golfer and set their sights on getting a caddy to blog about their pro’s preparation. Understandably, they are thrilled to have Julieta, a “self-proclaimed computer addict,” according to James Gregson, and anticipate at least 10 posts from her in the month leading up to the event. I just checked her blog and she posted from Pine Needles before play began. She discusses her preparation, her off time (including her family and her dog, Bimba) and much more. Her writing is as charming as she is and it’s so great to see regular updates and insights from an LPGA professional. Kudos to HSBC for this great score!

Comments are enabled, so she might even reply if you want to communicate with this superstar of a golf chick. Great job, Julieta! And good luck!

Next post.

U.S. Open & Golf courses for women

First, I have to get this out – It should be called the U.S. Open. Period. They don’t call the one the men play the U.S. Men’s Open. Golf is golf no matter which gender plays.

That being said, I am a subscriber to the magazine Golf For Women. I mean come on, I have to keep up with what’s going on in the world for golf chicks.

The latest issue of GFW includes their biannual picks for the Top 50 courses for women. And guess what course is their new #1? That’s right, the location of this weekend’s U.S. Open: Pine Needles Lodge & Golf Club in Southern Pines, NC. The players sure seem to agree. I gotta say, Pine Needles looks amazing. I sure would like to get my clubs on it. Besides, NC isn’t on my list of states played yet so I could kill two birds with one stone. Since no one invited me out for the U.S. Open so I could pull a Brandon Tucker and cover the tournament and play the course the day after, it’ll just have to remain on my to-do list.

Pine Needles

Top 50 courses

I think GFW is a top notch magazine and perhaps all they’re missing is my voice. However, I have to call them out on something here. That list I mentioned – the Top 50 courses for women – has a little glitch. (You know if you print it, some people will read it.) In order to be eligible for the list, the courses must meet a few criteria:

  • Must have at least one set of tees under 5300 yards
  • Should have at least two sets of tees under 6000 yards
  • Minimum of two tees must be rated for women
  • Should have few forced carries from the forward tees
  • Be in top condition
  • Present a women friendly environment

Of course the last three are subjective but the first three are pretty clear cut. Except for that pesky “should” in the second bullet. There are only two courses on the list that don’t meet that particular condition and given the name and prestige of one of them, I’m left wondering if there isn’t some external influence allowing these courses to make the list instead of others that are deserving.

#15: Sunriver Resort, Meadows Course in Sunriver, OR: 5287/6022/6625/7012

#19: Pebble Beach Golf Links: 5198/6116/6348/6737

Sunriver just barely surpasses the 6000 mark and both Sunriver and Pebble have those tees rated for women. Still, Pebble Beach being what it is I have to wonder if that should would be a must if not for that course needing a place on the list. Yeah, it’s on my list of must-plays, it’s just that $425 green fee that snags me up. Plus, I’d probably want to play the 6348 tees and they’re not rated for women so I couldn’t post the round if I did.

Personally, I dig courses that have all tees rated for women. Sure, most women aren’t going to want to play from the tips – including me – but I like to have options. Most men shouldn’t be playing from the tips either, but they have that choice.

*Side note: noticing a rant in my tone I checked the calendar and indeed, this post is brought to you by proud sponsor PMS.

Golfchick’s proposal

I hereby submit a new course for consideration by the GFW raters for the next list:

Osprey Meadows at Tamarack Resort, Donnelly, ID.

Osprey Meadows Score Card

Not only is the course a great layout for players of all abilities, all tees are rated for men and women. Plus, they’re denoted by shapes and colors like ski slopes and have handicap recommendations. I think it’s brilliant.

Greg and I just got back from a trip to Idaho and our stay and play at Tamarack was enchanting for both of us. Plus their greens fees are friendly from $75-$119! (Hurry and play before they realize what they have and raise those prices!)

There will be much more on Tamarack, Osprey Meadows and that whole Idaho trip to come including photos. I just wanted Golf For Women to be aware of this place and hope they give it a place on their list next time around.

Next post.

Apparently there’s some big golf tournament going on

Sports writers and golf bloggers are covering the U.S. Open and Oakmont Country Club with the same fervor of CNN covering Paris Hilton. No detail left unreported.

Of course the difference is sports writers and golf bloggers are supposed to write about golf. It’s right there in their titles. The Cable News Network is supposed to cover the news. Even if they could somehow win an argument that Paris Hilton is news, that doesn’t excuse them from failing to report on all the real news going on while they spend 24 hours on Shawskank Redemption (thanks, Jon Stewart).

But since this isn’t the Shmaily Shmow, I’ll get back to golf.

There is so much being said about this tournament and the golf course that I really don’t feel I have much to add. Just like I do, you can get all the latest from the fine bloggers in my links list as well as the journalists on the commercial sites. I’ll just watch and root on my favorites like the fan I am. And I’ll be checking in with Brandon Tucker for live bloggerage from the event. Congrats to Worldgolf for getting media credentials for their bloggers at recent events!

Speaking of Worldgolf, they’re conducting a survey and if you complete it, you’re entered into a drawing to win a set of Ping clubs and bag.

Next post.

Gotta weigh in on Wie

Exactly what does it mean to be non-competitive? Well, the LPGA has put a number on it: 88.

If a non-member shoots an 88 or higher in an LPGA tournament, she is banned from LPGA events for the rest of the year. Golf writers have been typing until they’re blue in the hands about Michelle Wie’s withdrawal from last week’s Ginn Tribute.

In case you’ve somehow managed to miss the coverage, the gist is that she withdrew from the event after playing 16 holes including five bogeys, a double, a triple and even a quintuple-bogey (!) leaving her just two bogeys short of reaching that dreaded 88. However, she claims she withdrew because her previously injured wrist was bothering her. (Like, I tweaked it, you know?)

Would they have allowed her to withdraw if the reason was avoiding the 88 rule? No? So if that was the reason, she had to lie. What? Dishonesty is frowned upon in golf? It shows a lack of respect for the game, its rules, and your fellow players? Like, whatever. I guess it’s the truth, then.

There have been implications of a conspiracy involving LPGA officials and agents that warned Wie to drop out despite the rules on giving and receiving advice except from a caddie. Speaking of advice, there was a questionable situation in that same round in which she might have received those dreaded two strokes in the form of a penalty because her father gave her advice on that triple-bogey hole (they didn’t assess the penalty because she didn’t ask for the advice – though I agree with Beth Ann Baldry that perhaps the “didn’t ask” clause isn’t meant to include parents or coaches).

Yet another rule she gets away with not breaking – this time because she’s a non-member and it doesn’t apply – is that she played the golf course the week before the tournament, something members are barred from doing.

Learning how to avoid these types of mistakes (and learning that they are mistakes) can be done by players as they work their way up the ranks, playing in events in which they can compete and getting accustomed to the rules, etiquette and decorum expected of a professional golfer. This isn’t to say that Wie can’t be competitive in LPGA events. Of course she can, but her camp of marketers has launched her into a spotlight where every misstep is highlighted and must be defended.

The controversy surrounding her, plus her lack of experience leading to many of the blunders (like needing advice from a parent in the first place), plus her entire camp’s superstar attitude as if golf should be a laissez-faire system (but only for her) just eats away at my brain like the buzz of a casino when I get back to my hotel room. I think it leaves a bad taste in the mouths of anyone who cares about the rules of golf.

So what do we have here…

  • Possible dishonest withdrawal
  • Receiving advice
  • Pre-playing the course

All this in one tournament – no, one ROUND – on an LPGA Tour event. Funny thing is, sponsors are going to be chomping at the bit to give her more and more exemptions to LPGA and PGA Tour events because of all this. Just look at all the attention it generates.

So what about PGA Tour Events?

After conducting exhaustive research a quick google, I was unable to find any specific score associated with non-competitiveness on the PGA Tour. I guess that rule is a little more subjective over there. And Michelle Wie, Inc. excels at exploiting subjective rules.

I’m currently reading John Feinstein’s book Tales from Q School, from which I learned that in that tournament (the qualifying tournament for the PGA Tour and Nationwide Tour), players will be deemed non-competitive if they don’t “come close to breaking 80” in four rounds. The PGA doesn’t just ban these players for a year, they maintain a list of non-competitive players and make them prove that they can compete, essentially qualifying to qualify. The idea is that it’s not fair for players to be distracted by non-competitive players in a tournament that can make or break their careers. Q-School is grueling and a rite of passage that most players on the PGA Tour have had to endure, many of them several times. To go through all that just to be distracted from a PGA Tour event by a non-competitive player (or even sideshow) when they know they’ll have to go back to Q-School if they don’t produce… well, that certainly can’t be fair.

Remember Casey Martin, the golfer with the degenerative disease in his leg that took the PGA Tour all the way to the Supreme Court for the right to play in a cart and won? All the attention from that case made him into something of a sideshow as well, but he had the respect for the game not to exploit the system with his star power. Martin went back to Q-School year after year and played on the developmental tours in between, trying to work his way up to the PGA Tour. He did not use his stardom to apply for exemptions and try to make some cuts and maybe win enough money to stay. According to Tales from Q School, Martin “thought it pointless to take a spot in the field from someone else when he was likely to miss the cut.” I guess that’s because he knows how hard it is for those guys to earn their way there. No matter where you stand on the cart/no cart issue, you have to respect him for that.

Some people may blame the sponsors for giving Wie exemptions in the first place. I’m sure she doesn’t even have to apply for them, they’re just thrown in her lap. But that doesn’t mean she has to accept them. Some poor schmuck is going to have to go back to Q-School because some non-competitive player took up a coveted spot in the field in one too many tournaments. Of course, there is no way for a female player to earn her way to the PGA Tour. Not officially, at least. But maybe the next time she plays on an exemption and doesn’t “come close to breaking 80″(the standard for Q-School), maybe she should get a letter of non-competitiveness and be kept on file. Would they let her attempt Q-School? Even if she qualified to qualify? I doubt she’d dare if they did.

Oh, and… pssst…. Ms. Bivens… over here. How about a golf blogger’s exemption? I’ve been known to break 88 and who knows, I could string together a couple of miracle rounds and possibly make a cut. Okay, probably not, but think of the publicity we could generate!

Next post.

Commentary on The Masters and a proposed new PGA Tour slogan

These Guys are Good Pretty Good Better than You.

Whether it’s all part of the hoax or not, Tiger Woods looked almost human at The Masters.

In fact, Augusta National Golf Club made a bunch of professional golfers look silly this year. The combination of the weather, the rock hard course conditions, insanely slick greens and magnitude of the event made for unprecedented high scores at The Masters this year. The more it gets to you, the more it’ll get to you.

The shot that doesn’t fly as far as you’d expect and spins back into the water starts you thinking.

Now that you’re thinking, you miss a putt by less than an inch and it ends up 10 feet away from the hole which makes you nervous.

Now that you’re nervous, your next tee shot finds the trees and forces you to lay up (if you can get out) and now you’re scared.

Now that you’re scared, you remember where you are and you try too hard instead of just playing your game.

Now that you’ve abandoned your game, you’ll be lucky to shoot even par.

Don’t try to tell me these guys made bad swings, poor decisions and squeaky putts because their skill sets weren’t strong enough. They should be able to adapt to difficult course conditions, formulate sound strategies, club up and calm down. They got rattled on that first demanding day and their mental games failed them.

The strangest thing about it all for me is that every golf writer or blogger I’ve read is complaining that it was no fun to watch! Au contraire!

Now it’s not that I enjoy watching people suffer (not that anyone who gets invited to play at Augusta – in The Masters, no less – should be considered to be suffering at any time) but watching them struggle a bit allowed me to relate a little better to the players.

Of course, if in some parallel universe I actually got to play that course in those conditions from a special set of tees at a reasonable distance even without the added pressure of the event, I’d be lucky to break 100. But the point is, their struggles were recognizable. I am very familiar with punching out from the trees and hitting from drop areas and three putting. I could practically feel myself there doing it.

Unlike Zach Johnson whose dream of playing in The Masters was realistic, most of us will have to settle for watching others do it. Perhaps a realistic dream for mere mortals is to watch them do it in a recognizable fashion.

For me, this tournament was not only not boring, it took entertainment to a new level for golf. Even if my skills could improve enough so I could play more like the pros, this may have been the closest I’ll ever get to playing Augusta.

Next post.

Older posts Newer posts

© 2024 The Golfchick

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑